Last Blog Post Hanna's Writing Journal
2,007 3 19 29 Either and neither are both fairly similar to themselves. - user28567 Sep 29, 2013 at 21:00 1 Yep. "Neither" is just a contraction of "not either". I'm not sure you've understood the question - James Webster
"Either Is Fine" vs. "Both Are Fine" Difference Explained TrendRadars
#1 This is a doubt that has been lingering me for a long time. Could I say e.g.: « Esperar means both "to wait", "to hope" and "to expect"». My initial thought is that we can't, because "both" is always linked with the concept of "two" (as in both vs. all three ). If so, how can we rephrase the sentence or any other similar example? entangledbank
"Both? Both. Both. Both Is Good." Sticker for Sale by dreamhustle Redbubble
1 Answer Sorted by: 17 (number) for (number) simply means "you were successful (number) attempts out of (number) attempts" So you could be "seven for nine" or any other combination, athough it is rarely used that way outside of sports like baseball.
Both Sides Now Table Talk
(Are your mother and father going to Chile?) Both with nouns When we use both before a determiner (e.g. a/an, the, her, his) + noun, both and both of can be used: She knew both my children. (or. both of my children .) Both her brothers are living in Canada. (or Both of her brothers.) We can use both before a noun:
Both / Either / Neither English vocabulary words, Learn english words, English words
The word both is not necessary, but would be added for emphasis if there were something unusual about wanting more than one item. For example, if he had been offered one item but wanted two or three instead. If you wanted to add the same emphasis with three items, there is no single word for that, but you could say it like this:
One, two, three. four, five..... Prints Animurals
9 Answers Sorted by: 6 Triple: Adj. having or involving three units or members - triple bypass heart surgery Quadruple: Adj. having four units or members And quintuple, sextuple, septuple, octuple. One could continue with nonuple but that's getting kind of silly. (Citations from merriam-webster.com.) Share
Everyone has three sides Popular inspirational quotes at EmilysQuotes
To answer the general question in your title: Yes, it can. "The majority of his paintings feature either children, fishermen, or old people --This England, Autumn 1983", excerpt from MWCDEU page 293. You can also find related info on this type of coordination in the 2002 reference grammar by Huddleston and Pullum (et al.),
Conjunctions Archives English Study Here English Teaching Materials, Teaching English
I enjoyed all three of them movies. The three of them are hardworking employees. 2.2 Italian. In Italian, when referring to three things informally, you can use the expressions "tutti e tre" or "tutti e tre i" to express the concept of "both" for three things. For example: Tutti e tre i prodotti sono di alta qualità.
Routemybook Buy Three Men In A Boat Jerome K.Jerome by Nestling Books Online at Lowest Price
No. both refers to exactly two things. - Jim Jul 17, 2016 at 1:06 1 No one's stopping you. Your readers might find it a bit confusing, though. (Note that one mistake you make is to use "the" too much for your two sublists to be recognized as such, vs appearing to be a single 6-element list.) - Hot Licks Jul 17, 2016 at 1:18
How to Solve Equations with Variables on Both Sides (25 Examples!)
1 Imagine a person says "I take both the red line and the green line to get to work." We know that they are talking about two different subway lines because they name two different lines and they use the word "both" which is used when referring to two different things.
REVIEW Three Men in a Boat Delivers the Laffs Huzzaaah!
- Linguistics Stack Exchange Are there any languages with the equivalent of "both" for three items? Ask Question Asked 11 years, 6 months ago Modified 2 years, 7 months ago Viewed 3k times 10 Referring to this question it seems that English does not have the equivalent of "both" for three items.
Both, Either, Neither Exercise 2 Worksheet English Grammar
The language Old English descended from originally had three grammatical numbers. Singular (1), plural (3+), and dual (2). It was already on the way out in the Old English texts we have. Its descendants lost the dual totally, giving us the modern singular (1) and plural (2+). Both is a carry-over from this system.
Two bisexual women and their husband love parenting as threesome New York Post
As NOAD say: " When both is used in construction with and, the structures following 'both' and 'and' should be symmetrical in well-formed English. " In the first example, the symmetry or parallelism of 'for Y' and 'for Z' has been lost. The second and the third example are well-formed English. Share Improve this answer Follow
Both
If there are more why not just say "I'll take three of them." Why make it more complicated than it has to be? By the same token, if there were more than two, you wouldn't say "both" either. "All" is the only responce that makes sense. Primative languages have words for "one," "two," and "many." English has many vestiges of this.
Illustrative Mathematics
The good news for family physicians is that CMS has agreed to finally start paying for code G2211 in 2024, after three years of delay. 2 This is an add-on code for evaluation and management (E/M.
Both ENDS
What would be the correct word to use when referring to three or more items, in the same manner as the word both? For example, using two words, with the word both: "There are several recommendations I have to further improve the sites — both to improve their profit, and decrease their cost."